This is the blog of a company that fell into the publishing industry through the love of feeling an ink-and-paper book in your hands.

We don't pretend to know what we're doing, leaving us dealing with the realities of the modern publishing industry, harboring numerous iconoclastic ideas, and having an internet-sized repository of information at our fingertips. The blog is here to let us express our ideas, communicate among members across long distances, and act like we're an authority on something we know little about...and isn't that exactly what blogging is all about?

More Posts
December 2007
September 2007
August 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
September 2006
July 2006
June 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005

Blogs For Readers dot Com

Link here, please!

The Ethics of Reviewing Books
14 Dec 2007, 3:34:32 pm

I've just sent out a whole bunch of galleys to reviewers for a book that we're publishing this spring, and it's unpredictable who's going to review it. I always include the big-name reviewers, but I don't have high hopes, given they have limited space to fill with the numerous books they receive. I hope a few will have the courtesy to read the book and write a few words about it, kind or not, so long as the name gets out there.

If I ever wanted an insight into how book reviewers operate, I have it today: The National Book Critics Circle has released the results from their ethics poll, with some interesting statistics. An interesting one to me is the status of negative reviews -- should a reviewer withdraw a review if it is unkind to the book? The results are split down the middle: equal parts thought it was ethical and unethical. Back in 1987, however, 74% thought it was unethical to hold back a negative review. So, on the surface we're being nicer, but my guess it has less to do with ethics and more to do with service to the reader -- offering recommendations as opposed to reviews. Movie reviewers still give 1 star, but there's a limited number of movies out at a given time. Readers are stuck with a deluge of potential books at any time, so they (as I know I do) prefer to be given an idea of what's good, as opposed to a list of what to ignore.

Most of the other ethics questions have to do with a reviewers personal bias: do they know the author, would they benefit from giving the book a good review, and so on. However, one particular statistic will answer that big question most authors have: did the reviewer really read the whole book? I've seen one review of one of our books that really made me wonder, but according to this survey, reviewers, by and large, say it's unethical to review a book without completing it.

View the entire survey results here.

. . . . . . . . .